Hierarchies
First Order
Bible
Second Order
Prayer
Congregational Song
Third Order
Sermon
Treatise
  • Doctrinal Treatise
  • Controversial Treatise
  • Exegetical Treatise
  • Contemplative Treatise
Catechism
Religous Biography
Preface
  • Preface Catechism
  • Preface Biography
  • Preface Treatise Controversial
  • Preface Treatise Doctrinal
Pamphlet
  • Letter Pamphlet
  • Petition Pamphlet
  • Treatise Pamphlet
  • Sermon Pamphlet
Sets
core
Bible
Prayer
Congregational Song
Sermon
Treatise
  • Doctrinal Treatise
  • Controversial Treatise
  • Exegetical Treatise
  • Contemplative Treatise
Catechism
minor
Religious Biography
associated
Preface
  • Preface Catechism
  • Preface Biography
  • Preface Treatise Controversial
  • Preface Treatise Doctrinal
Pamphlet
  • Letter Pamphlet
  • Petition Pamphlet
  • Treatise Pamphlet
  • Sermon Pamphlet
Genres
Bible
Prayer
Congregational Song
Sermon
Treatise
  • Doctrinal Treatise
  • Controversial Treatise
  • Exegetical Treatise
  • Contemplative Treatise
Catechism
Religious Biography
Preface
  • Preface Catechism
  • Preface Biography
  • Preface Treatise Controversial
  • Preface Treatise Doctrinal
Pamphlet
  • Letter Pamphlet
  • Petition Pamphlet
  • Treatise Pamphlet
  • Sermon Pamphlet
Periods
Middle English
  • 1150-1199
  • 1200-1249
  • 1250-1299
  • 1300-1349
  • 1350-1399
  • 1400-1499
  • 1450-1499
Early Modern English
  • 1500-1549
  • 1550-1599
  • 1600-1649
  • 1650-1699
Late Modern English
    Denominations
    Anglican
    Catholic
    Nonconformist
    Unknown
    Authors
    Authors
    Translators
    Extended Search
    References
    Structural
    0/31
    0/7
    0/2
    Comment
    0/72
    0/7
    0/2
    0/8
    XML Citation Print
    Reading
    Working
    Melanchthon, Philipp Author Profile
    Author Melanchthon, Philipp
    TranslatorBennet, Henry
    Denomination
    History of Martine Luther, Iohn Ecolampadius, Huldericke Zuinglius Text Profile
    Genre Religious Biography
    Date 1561
    Full Title A famous and godly history, contaynyng the Lyues & Actes of three renowmed reformers of the Christia~ Church, Martine Luther, Iohn Ecolampadius, and Huldericke Zuinglius. The declaracion of Martin Luthers faythe before the Emperoure Charles the fyft, and the illustre Estates of the Empyre of Germanye, with an Oration of hys death, all set forth in Latin by Philip Melancthon, Wolfgangus Faber, Capito. Simon Grineus, & Oswald Miconus, Newly Englished by Henry Bennet Callesian.
    Source STC 1881
    Sampling Sample 1
    Text Layout
    The original format is octavo.
    The original contains contains comments and references,
    Annotations
    Downloads

    The hystory of the Lyfe and Actes of Martine Luther, Doctour of Diuinitie. Faythfully set foorth by Phillip Melancthon.

    THE reuerende Father
    Martin Luther promised
    in hys fatall tyme,
    to publyshe, aswell the
    discourse of hys lyfe, as
    causes of hys conflicts:
    whych he resolued to do, yf death to
    greedy of her pray had not reft vs the
    society of hym, and the heauens accelerated
    to place thys incomparable
    Iewell among the elect organes and
    vessels of God the father. Therefore
    I iudge it necessary that the consideracion
    of hys particular lyfe be luculently
    set forth. Since the same abou~ded
    with manye good examples, that
    may corroborate in syncere mindes ye
    fear of god, & not to digres, if I recite
    ye causes also, for that they aduertise

    B.i.

    1
    posterity of many excellent thynges.
    Further, by thys narracion, the sycophancye
    and sinistre reporte of them,
    maye be refuted, who vaunt he was
    encouraged by certayne Princes and
    other eminent Estates of the sacred
    Empire, to deface the dignitie of Bishops,
    or prouoked wyth inordinate
    desyre, he brake the band of seruitude
    in hys Monastical estate. And it had
    bene most requisite this discourse had
    bene wrytten by hym selfe. For albeit
    currish detractors would haue obiected
    thys common prouerbe.

    Such as wyth hawtye style, aduaunce theyr proper prayse: Deflect fro~ Sophies golden sawes and sue Morias wayes.

    Yet we, that knowe what rare vertues
    harbored in his head, what constancie
    lodged in hys diuine brest: are
    perswaded he would iustly and faithfully
    haue recited hys proper hystory,
    And many graue and godly men liue
    presently, who would haue condempned
    hys follye, if he had forged an other
    historye, as Poetes in their poesies
    2
    are wont to faine, considering he
    vnderstode the perfect order & sequele
    of hys actes were not vnknowen vnto
    them. But since hys fatal day hath
    preuented the publicacion of such an
    history: I wyl truly recite, that partlye
    by familiare conuersacion I haue
    sene, and partlye by informacion and
    approued testimonies of hys perfecte
    friendes I haue heard.
    Ther is an auncient Famely, and
    amplye augmented, of meane degree
    surnamed Luther, in the territorie of
    the Noble Earles of Mansfield. Martine
    Luthers Parentes firste inhabited
    the Towne Isleben, anon after
    they remoued to Mansfield, wher his
    Father Iohn Luther, exercised the
    office of a Magistrate, & was syngularlye
    estemed amonge all sortes, for
    hys integrity of lyfe.
    Hys Mother named Margaret, besydes
    that she had vertues worthy an
    honest Matrone, thys was syngular.
    Ther shined in her, continency, feare
    of God, and inuocacion, and al other
    vertuous persons constantly planted
    their eyes vpon her, as on a patron &

    B.ii.

    3
    president of al moral vertues. I haue
    some tyme enquired of her, at what
    time her sonne was borne: she answered,
    that she remembred the houre &
    the day of his natiuity, but of yt yeare
    she was ignoraunt. She affirmed he
    was borne the .x. day of Nouember
    at night, about a leuen of the clocke.
    And ye cause why he was called Martin,
    was for that the morow after he
    receiued Baptisme, was S. Martins
    day. But his brother Iames, an honest
    and vpright ma~, said: the whole
    Famely held opinion, he was borne
    the yere after the Natiuity. 1483.
    After he was growen to yeares of
    vnderstandyng, hys Parentes diligently
    taught hym to feare & knowe
    God, and accustomed hym to all domesticall
    duties of honest vertues.
    They foorthwith addressed hym to
    schoole, and George Aemilius Father
    led hym a lytle Infant to schole,
    who lyueth yet, and can recorde the
    truth.
    Euen about this tyme the Grammer
    Schooles began to flooryshe in
    the Townes of Saxony. Wherefore
    the sayd Martin, fully fourtene yeres
    4
    olde, was sent to Magdeburg, wyth
    Iohn Reynech, who hath prooued a
    worthy man, and by his vertue acquired
    high authority in his Countrye.
    There co~tinued since a conglutinate
    mutual loue betwixt Luther & Reynech,
    proceding either of agreement
    of nature, either of society in chyldish
    study. And yet Martine studied no lenger
    then one yeare at Magdeburg.
    Departing from Magdeburge, he
    repaired to Isenach, wher he studied
    foure yeares vnder one Scholemayster,
    who taught hym the Grammer
    more promptly and luckely, then any
    other. I haue heard Luther co~mende
    his wyt. He was sent to thys towne,
    because his Mother was borne in the
    same, of honest and auncient house.
    Here he atchieued his study in Gra~mer.
    And for that he hadde a lyuelye
    pregnant & subtil wit, and passingly
    apt to eloquence: he was preferred aboue
    his schoolefeeres, and excelled
    the other yonge Impes that learned
    with him in opposicion of hard questions,
    in copy of wordes, in composition
    of an Oration in prose, and in
    writing of Uerses.

    B.iii.

    5
    Hauyng then tasted the sweetenes
    of learning, as he was prone ther vnto:
    he went to an Uniuersitye, as to
    the fountayne of al Sciences. And yf
    he had founde meete and conuenient
    Instructors: he had knowen and comprised
    al kyndes of Sciences orderly,
    so great was the force of his vndersta~dyng.
    And it maye be some pleasaunt
    study of true Philosophie, and care to
    polysh hys tonge, would haue mollefied
    hys natural vehemency. But at
    Erford, he met wyth the Dialectique
    of that tyme, the whych by dexteritie
    and redynes of wytte, vnderstandyng
    more exactly the causes & sprynges of
    instruction, then others hys compagnions
    he greedely deuoured, and had
    in memory.
    And for that the excellencye of hys
    wyt embracing good litterature required
    many, & those selected things:
    he priuately red diuers workes of the
    auncient latine Authors, as Cicero,
    Titus Liuius, Uirgil, & others. He
    studied not these as the yong scholers
    are wont, collecting onely the Phrases,
    but as a doctrine or representacion
    of humayne lyfe. And therfore intentiuely
    6
    applyed hym selfe, to vnderstande
    the sence & sentence of the Authors.
    And hauyng a naturall good
    memory, he had as it were before hys
    eyes prest, all that he had learned, or
    hearde. He so excelled in hys younge
    yeres, that the whole Uniuersity had
    hys wyt in great admiracion.
    Beyng twentye yeres olde, he was
    graded Maister of Arte, and then he
    gaue hym selfe to the study of the Ciuil
    law, by the aduise of hys familiar
    and nyghest friendes, in so much that
    they iudged his marueilous pregna~cy
    of wyt and eloquence, ought not to
    lurke in obscure place: but be made
    notorious, hereafter to serue and be a
    necessary instrument of the publicke
    weale. And the next yere, which was
    the .xxi. of hys age, he sodaynly, & besydes
    the expectacion of hys Parents
    and friendes, repayred to the Couent
    of the Augustines at Erphord. Wher
    he entreated admission, & beyng admitted,
    he learned wyth marueilous
    diligence, not onelye the doctrine of
    the Couent: but also gouerned hym
    selfe wyth a great seueritye of discipline,
    and surpassed al other in all exercises

    B.iiii.

    7
    of Religion, in lections, in disputacions,
    in fastinges, and in prayers.
    He was naturally a smal feeder,
    wherat I haue mused much, sithe he
    was of stature tall and strong of body.
    I haue considered in him this abstinence:
    foure continual daies, when
    he was well disposed and healthy, he
    would refraine from meate & drinke.
    And often tymes I haue seene, when
    a long season he would dyet hym self
    with a small peece of breade and one
    hearyng.
    The cause wherefore he addicted
    him selfe to this Monasticall order of
    life: was because he beleued the same
    to be most conformable to sincere religion,
    and to the vnderstanding of
    Gods doctrine, as he hath related, &
    many hath knowen. Often tymes he
    was take~ with great and trembling
    feares, when he attentiuely considered
    the wrath of God, & the marueylous
    examples of his punishmentes,
    that he was in a maner reft of hys
    wyttes. And I haue marked at a certaine
    tyme, that beyng sore abashed
    in one disputacion of thys doctrine,
    because he gaue attentiue eare therevnto:
    8
    he was sode~ly forced to remoue
    into a nygh Chamber, & ther resting
    on his bed, he medled & reported ofte
    this sentence: God hath shut vp al vnder
    our vnbelief, to the end he might
    extende mercye to all. These abashmentes
    encreased after, but the~ most
    asperously he felt the~, whe~ he lost hys
    deare friende & companion, who was
    slayne, I know not by what mishap.
    Then penurye pricked hym not to
    this Monkerye, but the affection he
    had to learne to serue God. Albeit he
    learned ther the doctrine vsed in scholes,
    he red the Doctors of sentences,
    and in publick disputacions, distinctly
    expressed the difficulties, which other
    could not vnfold, whereat many
    mused: Neuertheles, for yt he sought
    not in this kinde of lyfe to wyn brute
    according to the vertu of his wit, but
    to norish him in the feare of God: he
    vsed these studies, as one that esteemed
    not to be principall of that he
    searched and easelye conceyued those
    scholastical Methodes. In the meane
    season he redde with great affection
    the fountaines of heauenly doctrine,
    that is, the Prophetes and Apostles,
    9
    therby to frame hys lyfe and conuersacion
    to the wyll of God, and so he
    continued in the feare & faith of God,
    as by manye thynges it was apparent.
    Yea, howe muche the more earnestly
    he coueted thys exercise, or holy
    contemplacion, so muche the more
    he was troubled wyth his dolour and
    abashment.
    He declared he was manye tymes
    confyrmed by conference with an old
    man in the Couent of Augustines at
    Erphord. And impartyng hym wyth
    hys tremblyng feares, he learned many
    thynges touchyng fayth, and also
    told vs, he reasoned wyth hym of that
    Article of the Simbole, whych is: I
    beleue the remission of synnes. He expressed
    vnto Luther thys Article in
    thys sort: We may not generally beleue
    onelye that synnes are or haue
    bene remitted to some, as the Deuils
    beleue, they were forgeuen Peter or
    Dauid: but that Gods expresse commaundement
    is, that euerye man
    should beleue particularly his sinnes
    are forgeuen. And further he sayd,
    that thys interpretacion was confyrmed
    by the testimonies of Saynt Bernard,
    10
    & he had shewed hym the place
    in the Sermon of the Annunciacion,
    where it is thus set foorth: But adde
    that thou beleuest this, yt by hym thy
    synnes are forgeuen the. This is the
    testimony, that the holy Ghost giueth
    thee in thy hart, saying: Thy syns are
    forgiuen thee. For this is the opinion
    of the Apostle, that man is freely iustified
    by fayth.
    Luther sayd he was not onely stre~gthened
    by these wordes: but yt he was
    also instructed of the ful meaning of
    saint Paule, who repeateth so many
    times this sentence: We are iustified
    by fayth. And hauing read the exposicions
    of many vpon this place: he the~
    perceued as wel by the purpose of the
    olde man, as by the comfort he receyued
    in his spirite, the vanity of those
    interpretacio~s, which he had besydes
    him. And reading by little and lyttle,
    with conferring the sayinges and examples
    of Prophetes and Apostles, &
    continual inuocacion of God, and excitacion
    of fayth by force of prayers,
    he perceiued that doctrine more euidently.
    Then he began to reade S. Austens
    11
    bookes, where he found many goodly
    sentences, among other in the exposicion
    of the Psalmes, and in the
    booke of the Spirite and the Letter,
    which co~firmed this doctrine of faith
    & consolacion that was illumined in
    his hart. And yet he laid not aside the
    Se~tenciaries. He could recite by rote
    word by word Gabriel and Cameracensis.
    He red long tyme the bookes
    of Occan, & preferred his subtiltie aboue
    Thomas Aquin, and Scotus.
    He red also and reuolued Gerso~, but
    aboue al the rest, he red and perused
    al ouer Saynt Austens workes, and
    committed them to perfect memory.
    And thus he beganne diligentlye to
    studye at Erphord, where he continued
    foure yeares in the Couent of
    Augustines.
    About this tyme one Staupicius a
    famous wyght, who ministred hys
    helpe to furder the erection of an Uniuersity
    in Uitteberge, endeuoured
    also to haue Schooles of Diuinitye
    founded in thys newe Uniuersitye.
    When he had considered the Spirite
    and erudition of Luther, he called
    12
    hym from Erphord, to place hym in
    Uitteberg, in the yeare .1508. and of
    hys age .xxvi. There hys towardnes
    appeared in the ordinarye exercise of
    Schoole and predication. And as it
    happened that manye wyse and learned
    men attentiuely heard Luther,
    namely the Doctor Mellerstad. The
    sayd Mellerstad woulde often tymes
    say, Luther was of suche a marueylous
    spirite, and so ingenious, that
    he gaue apparent significacion, at
    one tyme or other, he woulde introduce
    a more compendious, facile and
    familiar maner of teaching, and alter
    and abolyshe the order that then
    was vsed.
    There fyrst he expounded the dialectique
    and Phisique of Aristotle,
    and in the meane whyle intermitted
    no whyt hys studye in Theologye.
    Three yeres after he went to Rome
    about the differences of the Monkes,
    and returnynge the same yeare, hee
    was graded Doctor, at the expences
    of Elector Fridericke, Duke of Saxonye,
    accordyng to the solempne maner
    of Schooles.
    13
    For he had heard him preach, wel vnderstanded
    the quicknes of his spirit,
    diligently considered the vehemency
    of his wordes, and had in singular admiracion
    those profounde matters,
    which in his Sermons he luculently
    and exactly exposed. And that al men
    maye perceiue the degree of Doctor
    was geuen hym by precipitacion of
    iudgement: it is wel knowen he was
    then but thirty yeare old. He declared
    that Staupicius against his wyll enforced
    him to take that degre, saying
    merely vnto him: that God had many
    thinges to bring to perfection in hys
    Churche, wherein he would employ
    Luther. And thoughe these woordes
    were spoken merely: yet it came so to
    passe anon after, as manye predictions
    or presages proue true before
    chaunge.
    After this he began to expound the
    Epistle to the Romains, & conseque~tly
    the Psalmes. But howe • he declared
    them so diuinely, that it semed in
    the iudgement of al faythfull & learned
    men, he was a shyning lyght, a
    bright Phebus, that began to clear
    after a long cloudy and obscure sky
    14
    Ther he shewed the differe~ce betwixt
    the law and the Gospel. He also confounded
    the errour that raygned then
    in schooles and Sermons, the whych
    errour taught, that men merite remission
    of synnes by their proper woorkes,
    and that they be iust before God,
    by outward discipline, as the Phariseis
    taught. Luther diligentlye reduced
    the myndes of men, to the Sonne
    of God. And as Iohn Baptist demonstrated
    the Lambe of God that tooke
    away the synnes of the worlde: euen
    so Luther expressely shewed that sins
    are freely remitted, for the loue of the
    Sonne of God, and that we oughte
    faithfully to embrace this bountefull
    gift. He also illustrated diuers other
    pointes of ecclesiastical doctrine.
    These happye begynnynges of so
    good matters, got him great authority,
    considering his lyfe was correspo~dent
    to hys profession, and it plainly
    appeared his woordes were no lyppe
    labour, but proceded from the verye
    hart. Thys admiracion of his holye
    lyfe much inflected, and allured the
    hartes of his Auditours, and therfore
    many notable personages, familiarly
    15
    knowing hym, and seing him innouate
    the vsuall Ceremonies, resisted
    hym nothing, but in respect of the authority,
    he procured before as wel for
    that he reueled many good matters,
    as that his lyfe was holye consented
    wyth him in his opinions, with the
    which they saw the world deuided diuersly,
    and therfore were pensiue and
    very sore greued.
    At thys tyme Luther altered nothing
    in the ceremonies, but precisely
    obserued hys rule among hys fellowes,
    he medled no doubtful opinions,
    but expressed thys common doctrine,
    as principallest of all other, in
    familiar maner to all men, elucidating
    the same more and more, to say
    the doctrine of repentaunce, of remission
    of synnes, of fayth, of true comfort
    in times of aduersity. Euery ma~
    receiued good taste of this swete doctrine,
    and the learned conceiued high
    pleasure to behold Iesus Christ, the
    Prophetes and Apostles come foorth
    into lyght, out of darkenes, pryson,
    and other ordures, to vnderstand the
    difference betwyxt the lawe and the
    Gospell, betwyxt the promises of the
    16
    Law, and the promise of the Gospel,
    betwixt spirituall Iustice, and ciuill
    thynges, whych certainlye could not
    haue bene found in Thomas Aquin,
    Scotus, nor hys semblables.
    He considered this also, that many
    were instigated & sollicited by Erasmus
    learned woorkes, to studye the
    Greeke and Latine tonges, who perceiuing
    a more gentle & ready order
    of teaching the~ before, began to haue
    in contempt the Monkes barbarous
    and sophistical doctrine: and specially
    suche as were of a gentle nature &
    good disposicion. Luther began to study
    the Greke and Hebrue tonges, to
    thys ende, that after he had learned
    the phrase & propriety of the tonges,
    & drawen the doctrine out of the very
    fountaynes, he myghte geue more
    sound iudgement.
    Whilest Luther was in this course
    of study, a certaine Dominicke Frier
    named Tecel, a most impudent Sicophant
    if euer there raygned any caused
    the Popes Indulgences or Pardons
    to be caryed and sold about the
    Country. Luther, much moued wyth
    the blasphemous sermons this shameles

    C.i.

    17
    Friar preached, and hauyng hys
    hart earnestly bent wyth ardent desyre
    to mayntaine true religion, published
    certain proposicions of Indulgences,
    whych are in the fyrst Tome
    of hys woorkes, and fixed them openlye
    on the Temple that ioyneth
    to the Castell of Uitteberg, the morrowe
    after the feast of all Saynctes,
    the yeare. 1517.
    Thys beggarlye Friar alwayes
    lyke vnto hym selfe, hopyng to obtayne
    the Popes blessynge, assembled
    certayne Monkes and Deuines,
    meanelye seene in Sophistry, in hys
    Couent, and foorthwyth commaunded
    them to wryte something against
    Luther. And whylest he would not
    seeme to be dombe, he beganne not
    onelye to inueye in hys Sermons,
    but to thunder agaynst Luther, and
    balking out hys Asinine brayde, cryed:
    Luther is an hereticke, and worthye
    to be persecuted wyth the fyre,
    and besydes thys he burned openlye
    Luthers propositions, and the Sermon
    he wrote of Indulgences. Thys
    rage and hellyshe fury of thys bagge
    bearer Friar Tecel, enforced Luther
    18
    to treate more amply of thinges, and
    to mayntaine the truth.
    Beholde what were the begynnynges
    of thys controuersye, wherein
    Luther neyther suspecting ne dreamyng
    of anye chaunge that myghte
    happen in the ceremonyes, dyd not
    vtterly reject the Indulgences, but
    required a moderacion in them. And
    therefore they falselye accuse hym,
    that blase he beganne wyth plawsible
    matter, and whereby he myghte
    get prayse, to the ende in processe of
    tyme, he myght chaunge the state of
    the Common weale, and purchase
    authoritye, eyther for him selfe or other.
    And sure, hee was not suborned
    or sturred by Courtiers, as the Duke
    of Brunswike wrote that the Duke
    Fredericke was sore offended that
    suche contencion and controuersye
    should aryse, hauyng regarde to the
    sequele thereof, that all be it thys begynnyng
    proceeded fauourablye, yet
    the flame by lyttle and lyttle kyndeled,
    woulde haue spreadde further,
    as Homere maketh mencion of
    Fame.

    C.ii.

    19
    Fame is an euil, then the whych
    no swyfter can be found:
    For she doth florysh wt her chaunge
    and getteth force by ground.
    Smal with first dred, then large
    she growes, & lifts her in ye aire
    Thus to Ioues seat through cloudes
    & skies, the blasting doth repaire.

    And as this good Duke Frederick
    was one of al the princes of our time
    that loued best quiet & common tranquillity,
    neither was auaricious, but
    wyllyngly bent to referre al his counsels
    to the common vtilitye of all the
    world, as it is easy to be coniected diuers
    waies: so he neither encouraged
    nor fauoured Luther, but often represented
    semblant of heauines and sorrow,
    whych he bare in hys hart, fearyng
    greater dissencions.
    But as he was wyse, and followed
    not onelye prophane iudgementes,
    whych co~maund the tender springes
    of al chaunges to be sodeinly oppressed:
    so takyng in counsayl the diuine
    rule, and wel deliberating therupon
    whyche enioyneth obedience to the
    Gospell, and forbyddeth to resist the
    20
    tryed truth, and termeth it a blasphemy,
    horribly co~dempned of God, partinaciously
    to repugne the truth. He
    dyd that many wyse and godly wold
    haue done, he obeyed God, leauyng
    vnto hym hys diuine power, he redde
    diligently that that was writen, and
    he would not abolysh, that he iudged
    to be sincere and true.
    I know very wel he made inquisicion
    often tymes, what wer the wise
    and learned me~s opinions touchyng
    these thinges. I knowe he gently besought
    Erasmus in that assemblye
    whych The emperour Charles the fift
    made, in the City of Colein after his
    Coronacion freely to tell hym hys opinion,
    if Luther had erred in those
    differences, wherof he principally entreateth.
    Then Erasmus sayde, that
    Luthers opinion was good: but that
    he desired moderacion of style in him.
    Wherof Duke Frederick wrot after
    greuously to Luther, exhortyng hym
    to temper the vehemency of his style.
    It is also appare~t, that Luther promised
    ye Cardinal Caietanus to kepe
    silence, prouided also his aduersaries
    would do the lyke. Whereby we may

    C.iii.

    21
    gather, that at that time he determined
    not to sturre any newe debates,
    but rather coueted the co~mon quiet,
    and that he was prouoked by litle &
    lytle to other matters, throughe the
    excitacion of vnlearned writers.
    Then followed disputacions of differe~ce
    betwixt diuine & humain law,
    of the horrible prophanacion of ye supper
    of our Lord, in selling & applieng
    the same for other purposes. Here he
    was forced to expres the cause of the
    sacrifice, & to declare the vse of the sacramentes.
    Now the godly & faithful
    Christians, closed in Monasteries, vnderstanding
    Images ought to be eschewed,
    began to abando~ ye wretched
    thraldom, in which thei wer deteined
    Now Luther, ye plainlier to expres
    the doctrine of repentaunce, of remission
    of syns, of faith, & of indulge~ces,
    he added these matters: The differe~ce
    of diuine & humain lawes, ye doctrine
    of the vse of our Lords supper, of baptisme
    & of vowes, and these were hys
    principal conflictes. As touching the
    question of the Romain Bishops power,
    Eccius was ye author thereof, &
    for none other respect, the~ to inflame
    the fyry wrath of the Pope & Princes
    22
    against Luther. The simbole of ye Apostles,
    ye same of Nice & Athanasius
    he conserued in their integrity. Further
    he declareth in diuers his works
    sufficiently, what innouacio~ is to be
    required in ye ceremonies & tradicio~s
    of me~, & wherfore they ought to be altered.
    And what fourme of doctrine &
    administracion of the sacraments he
    required & approued, it is appare~t by
    the confessio~ the Elector Iohn Duke
    of Saxony, & Prince Phillip Landgraue
    of Hessia presented to the emperor
    Charles the .v. in the yere 1530. in
    the assembly at Augsburg. It is manifest
    also by ye cerimonies of ye Church
    in this City, & the doctrine yt is preached
    in our Church, the so~me wherof
    is fully comprised in this confession:
    I alledge this yt the godly may consider
    not onely what errors he hath corrected
    & reproued, & what images he
    hath defaced & abolished: but also thei
    may vnderstand he hath co~prehended
    ye hole doctrine necessary for ye church
    he hath set ye ceremonies in theyr purity,
    & geuen examples to the faithful
    to repurge & reforme the Churches, &
    it is necessary for posterity to knowe
    what Luther hath approued.
    23
    I wyl not here commemorate, who
    were the first yt published both partes
    of the Supper of our Lord, who fyrst
    omitted the priuate Masses, & where
    fyrst the Monasteries were abandoned.
    For Luther hath disputed verye
    lytle of these before ye assembly which
    was made in the Towne of Uangions,
    in the yeare 1521. he chaunged
    not the ceremonies, but in his abse~ce
    Carolostadius and other altered the~.
    Then Luther returning after that
    Carolostadius had deuised & done certain
    thinges, rather to brede mutiny
    then otherwyse manifested by euide~t
    testimonies, published abroade touchyng
    his opinion, what he approued
    and what he myslyked.
    We know that politike men euermore,
    detested all chaunges, and we
    must confesse, ther ensueth some euil
    of dissencions, yea trulye moued for
    ryght good causes in thys horryble
    confusion of humayne lyfe, and yet it
    is our duty euermore in the Church,
    to aduaunce Gods ordinaunce aboue
    humayne constitucions. The eternal
    father pronounced thys voyce of hys
    sonne: This is my welbeloued sonne
    24
    heare hym.
    And menaceth eternall
    wrath to al blasphemers, that is such
    as endeuour to abolishe the manifest
    verity. And therefore Luther dyd as
    behoued a Christian faithfully to do,
    considering he was an Instructor of
    the Church of God. It was hys office
    I say to reprehe~d pernicious errors
    whych Epicures rable, wyth a monstrous
    impudencye heaped one vpon
    an other, and it was expedient hys
    Auditors dissented not from hys opinion,
    synce he taught purely. Wherfore
    if alteracion be hatefull, and many
    peryls grow of dissention, as we
    certaynly see manye, whereof we be
    ryght sory: they are in fault partlye
    that spread abroade these errors, and
    partly that wyth diuelyshe dysdayne
    presently mayntayne them.
    I do not recite this onely to defend
    Luther & hys Auditors, but also that
    the faythful spirites may co~sider now
    and in tyme to come, what is the gouernau~ce
    of the true Church of God,
    and what it hath alwayes bene, how
    God hath gathered to hym selfe one
    eternal Churche, by the voyce of the
    Gospel, of thys masse of sinne, that is
    25
    to say, of the huge heape of humayne
    ordures, among who~ the Gospel shyneth
    as a sparke amyd the darke. As
    in the tyme of the Phariseis Zachary,
    Elizabeth, Mary, and many other
    reuerenced & obserued the true doctrine:
    So haue manye preceeded vs,
    who purely inuocated God, some vnderstanding
    more clearely, then some
    the doctrine of the gospel. Such a one
    was the old man, of whom I wrote,
    that often tymes comforted Luther,
    when his astoneinges assayled hym,
    & after a sorte declared vnto hym the
    doctrine of the fayth. And that God
    may preserue henceforth the lyght of
    his Gospell, shinyng in many: let vs
    pray with feruent affection, as Esay
    prayeth for hys Hearers: Seale the
    law in my Disciples. Further, thys
    aduertisement sheweth playne, that
    coloured supersticions are not permanent,
    but abolished by God, and sythe
    thys is the cause of chaunges, we
    ought diligentlye to endeuour, that
    errours be not taught ne preached in
    the Churche.
    But I returne to Luther. Euen as
    at the begynnyng he entred in thys
    26
    matter wtout any particular cupidity:
    so thoughe he was of a firy nature, &
    subiect to wrath, yet he alwayes remembred
    his office, onely co~tendyng
    in his teaching, & prohibited warres
    to be attempted, and distingued wisely
    offices, wherein was any difference,
    to say: the Bishop feedyng the flocke
    of God, and the Magistrates that by
    authority of the sword committed vnto
    them, repres a certayne multitude
    of people subiect vnto them.
    Wherefore when Sathan contendeth
    by scandales to dyssipate the
    Churche of God, and contumeliously
    enrage agaynst hym, and delyghteth
    to doo euyll, and reioyceth to behold
    vs wallowe in the puddle of errour
    and blyndnes, smylyng at oure
    destruction, he spendeth oyle and toil
    to enflame and sturre vp myscheuous
    instrumentes, and mutining spirites
    to sowe sedicion, as Monetarius and
    hys lyke. Luther repelled boldlye
    these rages, and not onely adorned,
    but also corroborated the dygnitye
    and bandes of politicke order and ciuill
    gouernement.
    27
    Therfore whe~ I co~sider in my mind
    how many worthy men haue bene in
    the church, that in this erred, & were
    abused: I beleue assuredly yt Luthers
    hart was not onely gouerned by humayn
    diligence, but with a heauenly
    light, co~sidering how constantly he abode
    wythin the limites of hys office.
    He held not onely in contempt the
    sedicious Doctours of that tyme, as
    Monetarius and the Anabaptistes:
    but also these horned Byshoppes of
    Rome, who arrogantly & impudently
    by theyr deuised decrees affirmed,
    that Saynt Peter had not the charge
    alone to teache the Gospell, but also
    to gouerne common weales, and exercise
    ciuil iurisdiction.
    Moreouer he exhorted euerye man
    to render vnto God that appertayned
    vnto God, and to Cesar that belonged
    to Cesar, to say that al should
    serue God, wyth true repentaunce,
    knowledge and propagacion of hys
    true doctrine, inuocacion & workes,
    wrought wyth a pure co~science. And
    as touchyng ciuil pollecy, that euery
    one should obey the Maiestrates, vnder
    who~ he lyued in al ciuil dutyes, &
    28
    reuerences for Gods cause. And certenly
    Luther was such a one, he gaue
    vnto God, that belonged vnto God,
    he taught God, he inuocated God, &
    had other vertues necessary for a ma~
    that pleaseth God. Further, in politike
    conuersation he constantlye auoyded
    al sedicious counsels. I iudge
    these vertues to be so excellent ornamentes,
    as greater and more deuine
    ca~not be required in thys mortal life.
    And al be it that the vertue of thys
    man is worthy commendacion, & the
    rather for that he vsed the gyftes of
    God in all reuerence: yet our duty is
    to render condigne thanks vnto God
    that by him he hath giue~ vs the light
    of the Gospel, and to conserue and enlarge
    the remembraunce of hys doctrine.
    I weye litle the braid & sclaunder
    of the Epicures and Hipocrites,
    who scoffe and condempne the manifest
    truth. But I stay wholy here vpon,
    that the vniuersal Churche, hath
    consented perpetuallye to thys very
    doctrine, which is preached in our
    Church, where vnto we must frame
    our lyfe and deuocion conformable.
    And I beleue yt this is the doctrine,
    29
    wherof the sonne of God speaketh: If
    any loue me, he wyll keepe my commaundementes,
    and my father wyll
    loue him, and we wyll come to hym,
    and plant our dwelling with hym. I
    speake of the somme of the doctrine,
    as it is vndersta~ded, and explaned in
    our Churches, by the faithfull & learned
    Ministers. For al be it that some
    one often times expoundeth the same
    more aptly and elegantly then some
    other: yet as touching the effect, the
    learned and faithful doo agree in all
    poyntes.
    Then weying & perpending with
    my selfe long tyme the doctrine that
    hath bene of al tymes, it semeth vnto
    me that since the Apostles there haue
    bene foure notable alteracions after
    the first purity of ye Gospel. Origene
    had his tyme. Al be it there wer some
    of a sound and sacred opinion as Methodius,
    who reproued the furies and
    dotages of Origene, yet he co~uerted
    the Gospell into Philosophye in the
    hartes of many that is to saye: he aduaunced
    this perswasion, that one
    meane discipline of reason deserueth
    remission of synnes, and that thys is
    30
    that iustice, wherof is sayd: The iust
    shall lyue of his fayth. That age almost
    lost the whole difference of the
    Law and the Gospel, and forgat the
    words of ye Apostles. For they vnderstoode
    not the naturall significacion
    of these wordes: Letter, Spirite, Iustice,
    Fayth. Now when the proprietye
    of wordes was lost, whych be notes
    of the very thinges, it was necessary
    that other thinges should be contriued.
    Out of this seede sprang Pelagius
    error, which wandred largely
    abrod. And therfore al be it the Apostles
    had geuen vnto ye Church a pure
    doctrine, as cleare & salutiferous fou~taines,
    yet Origene medled the same
    wyth muche ordure and impuritye.
    Then to correct the errors of that
    tyme, or at the least some part of the.
    God raised S. Austen, who repurged
    in some part the fountaynes, and I
    doubt not if he were iudge of dissencions
    at this day, but he wold speake
    for vs, & defend our cause. Certenly,
    as concerning free remission, iustificacion
    by faith, the vse of the Sacramentes
    and indifferent thynges he
    consenteth wholy wyth vs.
    31
    And albeit that in some places he expoundeth
    more eloquently and aptly
    that he wyl say, than in some, yet yf
    in readyng any do cary wyth them a
    godly spirite and quycke vnderstandyng,
    and al euil iudgement ceaseth,
    they shall soone perceyue he is of our
    opinion. And where as our aduersaries
    sometime do cite sentences selected
    out of his bookes agaynst vs, and
    wyth clamour prouoke vs to the auncient
    Fathers, they do it not for any
    affection they beare vnto the truth
    or antiquity, but maliciously to cloke
    them wyth the authority of the auncient
    fathers, in the presence of their
    Idols, whych antiquity neuer knewe
    of any these horned beastes & dombe
    Idols, as we haue knowen in these
    dayes.
    © 2015 Corpus of English Religious Prose | Impressum | Contact

    Login to Your Account